Nadiah Nadhirah: BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(2)

MINGGU 11 - TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(2)

Transkripsi video 2

Jadi bab 1 kita teruskan 1.3 pernyataan masalah. Okay. Pernyataan masalah. masalah ataupun masalah. Okay. Dalam pernyataan masalah biasanya pelajar mempunyai masalah ya. Nama pun pernyataan masalah. Masalah macam mana nak tulis pernyataan masalah. Ini sangat kritikal dan sangat penting. Kadang-kadang pelajar dia letak sampai 10 halaman. Masalah nak huraikan tentang penyataan masalah. Bila kita baca langsung tidak ada masalah. Jadi berhati-hati dan juga pelajar selalu letak pernyataan masalah tu dia letak yang dia rasa, macam “saya dapati bahawa pelajar tidak pandai mengira 1 hingga 10”. Awak tu siapa. Jadi kita tak boleh, kita kena ada rujukan. Pernyataan masalah, rujukan merupakan perkara yang penting. Perkara yang penting. Maknanya kita perlu rujuk. Perlu rujuk siapa yang punya kajian yang menunjukkan bahawa ada masalah dalam kajian tersebut. Ataupun kenyataan daripada orang ini atau daripada Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2019 mendapati bahawa pelajar kurang berminat untuk, untuk mendengar ataupun untuk mendengar cerita berbentuk sekian sekian sekian. Jadi itu dah menunjukkan macam menunjukkan benda negatif. Dan juga huraian daripada kajian Normaliza Abd Rahim itu mendapati bahawa lima pelajar didapati, didapati tidak boleh menggunakan kata kerja dalam dalam penulisan karangan. Contoh dia. Dan itulah dah nampak masalah. Sebab masalah itu bila kita dapati kita huraikan sikit. Kemudian masalah Normaliza Abd Rahim tu tadi disokong oleh kajian yang dijalankan oleh Nur Maisarah Roslan, 2019 yang mendapati bahawa pelajar tidak dapat mengenal pasti kata kerja dalam dalam membina, membina soalan. Contoh dia. Contoh ya. Jadi, jadi. Adalah sokong. Dua kajian ini sokong timbulnya masalah tersebut. Okay. Barulah betul. Jadi itu yang menunjukkan masalah huraian kita tu. Jadi sekarang. Jadi pelajar biasanya buat macam mana. Dia pergi buat. Okay contohnya kajian itu tentang kata kerja. Yang awak punya kajian tentang kata adjektif. Jadi awak boleh buat kajian oleh Normaliza Abd Rahim tidak berfokus kepada kajian tentang kata adjektif. Itu dikatakan pernyataaan salah. Salah tu. Tidak boleh. Tidak boleh. Tidak boleh macam seolah-olah memanglah dia buat kata kerja sebab kata kerja, kata kerja sebab dia berfokus kepada kata kerja. Tetapi awak tak bolehlah kata dia tak buat pasal kata adjektif. Memanglah tak buat kata adjektif sebab dia berfokus kepada kata kerja. Jadi salah begitu ya. Jadi huraian di sini ini macam saya katakan tadi perlu ada ayat yang dikatakan oleh pengkaji tersebut dalam artikel dia. Jadi pernyataan masalah ini terbahagi kepada objektif. Kalau contoh objektif ada dua, ada dua perenggannya di sini. Kalau objektif ada tiga, makna ada tiga perenggan. Satu, dua, tiga. Jadi huraian dalam ini huraian daripada kajian. Dan disokong oleh siapa. Okay. Disokong oleh siapa. Ayat macam saya katakan tadi ya. Kemudian, hujung ayat itu, Awak kata “Justeru kajian ini” sebab berkaitan dah nampak jurang penyelidikan dalam ini. “Justeru kajian ini mengenal pasti, mengenal pasti wacana tekstual skrip animasi bla bla bla”. Sebab didapati kat sini ini bahawa kajian itu mendapati bahawa pelajar contohnya. Pelajar ataupun skrip animasi tidak melambangkan apa dia, apa dia. Jadi kajian itu menurut orang tu. Orang tu cakap. Bukan kita yang cakap, orang tu yang cakap. Jadi serupa juga dengan yang ini, kena ada sokong. Kajian ini didapati ada masalah dalam kajian tu pelajar tidak boleh mengenal pasti kata adjektif contoh dia. Kemudian, “justeru kajian ini ingin menganalisis kata adjektif yang terdapat dalam penulisan karangan kanak-kanak”. Macam contoh, pernyataan masalah ketiga okay. Menurut Norwida Roslan, 2019 pelajar didapati tidak boleh, tidak berminat dan tidak boleh mengira nombor satu sehingga dua puluh. Contoh dia. Kajian dia. Kajian dia didapati begitu. Jadi, justeru kajian ini ingin menganalisis okay. Menganalisis apa nama, pengiraan ataupun aktiviti pelajar dalam mengira nombor dari satu hingga dua puluh. Jadi kita kena kaitkan dalam hujung ayat perenggan itu, kaitkan dengan objektif ini. Hujung ayat ini, kaitkan dengan objektif ini. Hujung ayat ini kaitkan dengan objektif ketiga. Jadi, barulah ada pernyataan masalah ini berkaitan dengan awak punya objektif. Jadi, rujukan. Dalam rujukan yang dalam yang ini. Dalam permaslaahan kajian ini perlulah lima tahun ke belakang. Kita tak boleh la. Kita ambik apa nama pernyataan masalah daripada kajian yang lama-lama. Sebab kita kena faham bahawa kajian yang dijalankan sekarang ini semuanya dah berbeza ya. Dah berbeza dengan kita mempunyai teknik. Dunia digital jadi budak-budak pun pandai. Macam yang saya katakan sebelum ini, zaman dulu boleh la kata “Ei budak ni pandai betul. Cerdik betul. Kita tanya satu soalan, dia jawab sepuluh jawapan. Pandai”. Tetapi dalam dunia digital sekarang ini berbeza. Yang mana sekarang budak-budak kita bagi soalan, dia bagi jawapan sampai 47. Sampai kita kata “okay berhenti, jangan bagi jawapan dah, Letih cikgu nak dengar”. Jadi ada budak-budak macam tu sampai sekarang ini ya. Dia dah lebih ke hadapan. Sebab dia dah ada dunia digital ini masing-masing ada dah telefon mudah alih, telefon bimbit masing-masing dalam beg. Kadang-kadang telefon mereka lebih mahal daripada telefon kita. Bertabahlah kita ya. Jadi pastikan pernyataan masalah ini betul. Tak perlu panjang lebar. Kerana apa yang terdapat dalam rujukan dalam ini dan dalam ini semuanya ada huraian yang lebih panjang lebar dalam bab dua. Jadi, pernyataan masalah yang ini perlu ada lah dalam bab 2. Tak boleh la awak ada nama-nama ini, kemudian pemeriksa kata mana pergi nama-nama yang awak dah kata dalam pernyataan masalah dah tidak ada dalam bab 2. Tak boleh. Ini secara ringkas. Yang dikatakan tentang pernyataan masalah ini. Ini kita kata secara terperinci seluruh-seluruhnya. Tentang orang ini, Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2019 kajian dia secara menyeluruh. Ini dengan panjang lebar. Jadi maknanya, kena ada la. Yang ini nama yang awak sorot sini, ambik di sini mesti ada dalam ini. Pastikan betul pernyataan masalah ini. Amat penting. Jadi biasanya, pelajar didapati bahawa agak sukar untuk menulis pernyataan masalah. Jadi sekarang bila dah belajar ini, dah tidak ada masalah.

Video transcription 2

So in chapter 1 we proceed to 1.3 problem statement. Okay. Statement of problem. Problems or problems. Okay. In problem statement usually students have a problem. The name is also a statement of problems. How to write a problem statement. This is very critical and very important. Sometimes students put up to 10 pages. Problem to describe the problem statement. If we read directly there is no problem. So be careful and also students always put the statement of the problem he/she put what he/she feels, like "I find that students are not good at counting 1 to 10". Who are you? So we can't, we have to have a reference. Problem statement, reference is important. The important thing. That means we need to refer. It is necessary to refer to who has a study that shows that there is a problem in the study. Or a statement from this person or from Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2019 found that students are less interested in, to hear or to hear stories so much. So that shows how to show negative things. And also the description from the study of Normaliza Abd Rahim found that five students were found, found not to be able to use verbs in in essay writing. An example. And that's the problem. Because the problem is when we find we explain a little. Then the problem of Normaliza Abd Rahim was supported by a study conducted by Nur Maisarah Roslan, 2019 which found that students can not identify verbs in building, constructing questions. An example. Example. So, so. Is supportive. These two studies support the emergence of the problem. Okay. That's right. So that shows the problem of our description. So now. So students usually do what. He/She went for it. Okay for example the study is about verbs. That you have a study of adjectives. So you can do a study by Normaliza Abd Rahim does not focus on the study of adjectives. That is said to be a false statement. That's wrong. No way. No way. It can't be as if he did make verbs because of verbs, verbs because he focuses on verbs. But you can't say he didn't make adjectives. Of course he did not make adjectives because he focused on verbs. So wrong. So the description here is like I said earlier, there must be a sentence that the researcher said in his article. So the statement of this problem is divided into objectives. If the objective example has two, there are two paragraphs here. If there are three objectives, it means there are three paragraphs. One two three. So the description in this description is from the study. And supported by whom. Okay. Supported by whom. A sentence like I said earlier. Then, at the end of the sentence, you say "Therefore this study" because the related research gap has been seen in this. "Thus this study identifies, identifies the textual discourse of the animated script blah blah blah". The reason found here is that the study found that students, for example. Students or animated scripts do not represent what he is. So the study according to that person. That person spoke. It is not we who speak, it is the person who speaks. So similar to this one, there must be support. This study found that there is a problem in the study, students can not identify adjectives for example. Then, "therefore this study wants to analyze the adjectives found in the writing of children's essays". As an example, the third problem statement is okay. According to Norwida Roslan, 2019 students were found not to be, not interested and could not count number one to twenty. An example. His studies. His study found that. So, therefore this study wants to analyze, okay. Analyze what names, calculations or student activities in counting numbers from one to twenty. So we have to relate in the end of the paragraph sentence, relate to this objective. The end of this sentence, relate to this objective. The end of this sentence is related to the three objective. So, then there is a statement of this problem related to you having an objective. So, reference. In this deep reference. In the study, this study should be five years back. We can't. We take the name of the problem statement from a long ago studies. Because we have to understand that the study conducted now is all different. It's different with us having techniques. The digital world is so clever. Like I said before, in the old days we could say “Hey this boy is really good. That's right. We asked one question, he answered ten answers. Clever ”. But in today's digital world it is different. Which now we ask questions, kid gives answers up to 47. Until we say "okay stop, do not give answers already, teacher is tired to hear it". So there are kids like that until now. He is more forward. Because he already has this digital world, each of them has a mobile phone, each mobile phone in a bag. Sometimes their phones are more expensive than our phones. Let us persevere. So make sure the statement of this problem is correct. No need for length. Because of what is found in the references in this and in this all there is a longer description in chapter two. So, this problem statement should be in chapter 2. You can't have these names, then the word examiner goes to the names that you said in the problem statement are not in chapter 2. You can't. This is brief. That said about the statement of this problem. This we say in detail entirely. About this person, Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2019 her study as a whole. This is at length. So that means, there must be. This is the name you highlighted here, ambiguous here must be in this. Make sure the statement of this problem is correct. Very important. So usually, students find that it is quite difficult to write a problem statement. So now that you have learned this, there is no problem.

SUBSCRIBE PROF